Видео

Great video as usual. Btw what happened to the raycasting VOD on twitch?

C++ is the best

Maybe now they can start creating more optimized games 😂

As more people get access to something, the quality of it degrades.

C is GOD in the embedded world.

Incredible advice 10/10, worked for me

Amazing

Thank you. You have been an inspiration for my own YT channel about C. Keep up the good work. JB

I can't be the only one wondering: What does Romero think tho?

>Lexical anal ISIS I am scared

I am only seven minutes in, so this might be somewhere in there, but I'll post this for anyone who wants to know anyway: The difference between post-processing motion vector directional blur (common in games, disliked by some) and accumulation buffer motion blur (common in offline rendering, unnoticed by most) is that the former fakes the effect with simple linear smudges roughly aligning with the direction of motion that can have noticable "stepping" and can affect the wrong pixels, whereas the latter accumulates real motion across multiple sub-frames that are all fully rendered and blended together, resulting in the expected non-linear gradients. Also, games tended to overdo motion blur a lot when it was relatively new. Some implementations would also cause very noticable visual artifacting which probably negatively affected the effect's perception. Well implemented motion blur can make low frame rate games (e.g. 30 Hz console games) appear much smoother by hiding the discrete sample nature of computer graphics with the right amount of directional blur. This is also a technique that is used in movies, where a lot of depth of field reduces flickering, that usually plagues medium-fast rotational movements of the camera. Accumulation buffers were in OpenGL since forever and with more modern techniques, this has become fully programmable and thus much more flexible, yet it's not really used these days. The closest we get is the exponential decay buffers in temporal post-processing (which is commonly also the cause for artifacts like "ghosting"). Proper accumulation buffers were reset between frames, each frame taking only the motion over the duration of the exposure, like a literal frame on a real chemical photo film. That's computationally expensive and doesn't lend itself well to high-end semi-photorealistic rendering. Some older games that run at hundreds of frames per second have been used to show how much better accumulation motion blur looks though. I thing Digital Foundry did demonstrate it once with probably the first Halo game on PC. PS: I think the 60 Hz myth comes from the flicker fusion threshold which is about around 60 Hz for "most" people. But that's just part of the picture and hardly what that metric is meant for. I have seen some very questionable statements made on the basis of this. Well, I also knew some very good game developers who couldn't tell the difference between 30 or 60 Hz most of the time. So there seems to be some level of variation in individual perception.

Hi, I think now that the clock is offset, you can include time.h back in the source code.then it can compile without extra args. Great job!

Very interesting as always. I tried it myself, here is the result: char*ctime(),c,*t,*z,*s,*S="char*ctime(),c,*t,*z,*s,*S=\"#\";int f[]={8084,-370" "3,-9036,7692,9,5896,6164,7351,8212,8204,-22475},printf(),sleep(),time(),x,y;in" "t p(int c){printf(x<40&y<5&x%5<3&f[t[x/5]-48]+23515>>(12-3*y+x%5)?\"\\033[44m%" "c\\033[0m\":\"%c\",c);++x==80&&p(10)+y+++(x=0);}int main(){for(;;){time(&x);t=" "ctime(&x);for(c=3;c-=*t++==32;z=s=S);t[2]=t[5]=58;for(x=y=0;c=*s++;)if(35-c)c-" "94&&p(c);else for(;c=*z++;x==79&&p(34)+p(34))c-34&&c-92?p(c):p(92)+p(c);p(10);" "sleep(1);printf(\"\\033[13A\");}} //Copyright Wonshtrum //Inspired by Tsoding"; int f[]={8084,-3703,-9036,7692,9,5896,6164,7351,8212,8204,-22475},printf(),sleep (),time(),x,y;int p(int c){printf(x<40&y<5&x%5<3&f[t[x/5]-48]+23515>>(12-3*y+x%5 )?"\033[44m%c\033[0m":"%c",c);++x==80&&p(10)+y+++(x=0);}int main(){for(;;){time( &x);t=ctime(&x);for(c=3;c-=*t++==32;z=s=S);t[2]=t[5]=58;for(x=y=0;c=*s++;)if(35- c)c-94&&p(c);else for(;c=*z++;x==79&&p(34)+p(34))c-34&&c-92?p(c):p(92)+p(c);p(10 );sleep(1);printf("\033[13A");}} //Copyright Wonshtrum //Inspired by Tsoding

Bro is talking about js devs like they are the free masons

That Paul and shark shirt is wild

ware you in the bathroom?

"ooooo look at me... i'm a pomade abusing edge lord who disses react....".... yeah yeah react isn't perfect. wgaf.

I stole ideas from K&R. I took them and didn't put them back.

I would never want to run a niche OS like this 'Windows' ... I just use a totally-normal OS called Arch.

Работодатель: Какие языки программирования ты знаешь? Недопрограммист:Так ну вот смотри, я знаю Русский..... Работодатель: Можешь не продолжать...

Nowadays, my favorite channel! Awesome video (except that Python thing hahaha)! Mad respect for doing your videos live as a not native English speaker!

Haskell quine: main = liftA2 (>>) putStr print "main = liftA2 (>>) putStr print "

mpv enjoyer

I succeeded in making a C cloq that is smaller, rectangular and has high-res numbers (but rectangle comes at the cost of no includes, so it can't get the current time by itself) I uploaded it to G/H with my username being the same as my handle, chri (dash) k (that account only has one repo) I am talking in this weird way to try to not trip the auto-mod for the 13th time, and that number is *not* hyperbole

The law of total derivative is the one you are referring to.

2:01:50 jajajajja

Considering that code is only 7-bit ascii and it's not even the whole range you can obfuscate string by replacing it with numbers that encode whole patterns of letters and feed integers to printf instead of string literals.

No. He is wrong. He can only think of the context of game programming. No need for further to debate.

I'm in the camp that webpages should generally be DOCUMENTS, not applications. Static site generators like eleventy are my favorite at the moment. Eleventy uses an eye-watering stack of npm includes, but it doesn't matter because you are getting plain static HTML out the other end that you can do whatever you want with.

то есть ты просто заново изобрел 1С?

Bussin GriddyCode????

Some centering and padding with comments would make it even better than JS version

Worth mentioning awesome qlock by Yusuke Endoh (ruclips.net/video/pgAHW8OpcTY/видео.htmlsi=v9WjZHuioWQTbW_Q). This guy does a lot of crazy shit

In the final code you have the second to last line overflowing on the right block by two characters and the string right in there is unecessarily split. So you could merge those two strings back together (just remove the two quotes in the middle) and that line would perfectly fit the block.

I just started watching your videos, and holy shit your channel is fucking AWESOME SAUCE!!!

I find the idea of putting the chat into the subtitles interesting, although it just confused me when I didn't quite understand something you said, so I enabled subtitles to get a clue and then got something that had nothing to do with what you said XD

that is F-ing amazing

К Ершову вроде бы Джон Маккарти приезжал, а не Кнут.

Вообще-то не обязательно писать слова целиком. Для краткости можно использовать сокращения, аббревиатуры, корни слов.

What font does he use? Just curious

Yeah ditto to what others are saying. For critical non-game applications, it makes sense to retain the on-release behavior, as an added check against accidental inputs. Imagine a touchscreen app for banking, easy to see why this could be problematic. That said, maybe other confirmation systems make more sense... tying such safety measures to a UI idiosyncrasy fails to call attention to the pitfall -- it simply brushes it under the rug by ignoring all on-press behavior. Meanwhile, in games, there are so many examples of extremely popular games that nevertheless get this wrong. Dark Souls/Elden Ring/etc all use an on-release/on-hold system for their combined dodge/sprint buttons, and that negative edge behavior causes inexperienced (and/or inattentive) players to miss the timing for a roll despite actually pressing it in time. It's unintuitive, and it's a bandaid fix to allow multiple functions with one button. Whenever timing is critical (as is the case in ALL UI, because the user's time is valuable), on-release should be avoided. And to the extent that it allows users to "un-click", it merely serves as a confirmation check that could be implemented more robustly in other ways.

And all that work for nothing. He should have stopped and thought about what he es setting out to do, to realize that this is a waste of time. You do not want OOP.

I thought this was a video about getting more money back from the tax man for my kids. Now Im hooked on C!

The only one worthy of applause is C.

HTML is not a programming language but it is a markup language!

OH MY GOD. I PROGRAM IN REACT. I'M SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PISSED. pshhhhhhhhhh whatever bro. DO UI IN WHATEVER LANGUAGE YOU WANT!!!!!!! Do itin SPANISH for all I care.

Hi it's been a while in your channel. I wanted to know your development environment like what distro you're using and window manager etc.

Эх, а на русском никто не пишет :(

What is this xcancel?

Where i Can download Programming language ХУЯ?